- Apr 11, 2015
- 877
- 63
Yes, if one was to automatically assume that the "spring" ran anteriorly from front shoulder to rear hip. However, if one were to think out of the box, one might consider the "spring" running posteriorly front the front shoulder, around the back to the rear hip. Thusly, when the front shoulder turned "down and in" while the rear hip turned forward, this movement would then lengthen, and thus "load/stretch" said "spring".OsDad, there is no ‘spring’ running between the front-shoulder and rear-hip. The reason I asked Shawn the question, was to add clarity and facilitate the discussion. I expected a quick response correcting any such implication/interpretation. Instead Shawn passed on answering the question. What Shawn likely wished to communicate was the internal compression and tension forces taking place within the torso. It would be a questionable swing model to suggest that there is a ‘spring’ located directly between the front-shoulder and rear-hip.
Unfortunately, the bigger conundrum is associating any muscle activation based on any "spring" type theory regardless of where all of these "springs" are supposed to be in the body. Because there is no muscle in the body that when you "stretch" it, some sort of energy is being created or stored in said muscle, that supposedly is all suddenly "released", and the muscle "springs" back to it's original resting or neutral position.
Some odd stuff you'll read on some of these forums, and even odder the extent that some will argue a concept like it's their Waterloo, when it's obvious the haven't bothered to pick up a medical journal or A&P book, and take the time to make sure that *they* even understand what they're talking about, before trying to get someone else to believe their - let's just say - their "whatever".
Btw, that was not directed at any one person, as no one seems immune from it (myself included at times)...Five just happened to be the last person to post about the "spring" is all). Peace out.
Last edited: