- Jun 8, 2016
- 16,118
- 113
We disagree again.
Yes to hand torque. No to what is being demonstrated.
I'll have to think of something else to say to make it a hat trick. I'll get on that ASAP..
We disagree again.
Yes to hand torque. No to what is being demonstrated.
I'll have to think of something else to say to make it a hat trick. I'll get on that ASAP..
LOLOL, too funny pattar
Figures a Canadian would find that amusing
And the angle of the lead arm is relative to torso tilt which is relative to pitch location? For example, Low pitch = steeper angle vs high pitch = less angle
LOL, not just a Canadian, an avid hockey fan. Isn't it great to be a sports fan right now? March madness, NHL & NBA playoffs around the corner, and baseball season just about to begin... and because I'm in Canada I get to see my DD play ball the later end of April (which trumps everything else)
Kudos to Matt for presenting the info as if it's his, and/or new...but there's not a single thing in there that isn't/wasn't from HI ten years ago...the SnF drill, one legged, TTB, palm up, the list goes on.[video=youtube_share;fwAV_zEf_1Y]https://youtu.be/fwAV_zEf_1Y[/video]
Herein lies the biggest problem of discussing hitting on an Internet forum...people write something that they don't actually mean, but say or use in a general sense that they then need to explain the exact nuances of in person to a student or if they were talking to someone in person.
Example: This is the first time I've heard you say that when you say 50/50 weight shift with the COM into or at the launch position...that you don't really mean a 50/50 COM at the launch position. You then go on to write that a hitter should, "maintain the load in your back leg to stay back" as part of your teachings or understanding of the swing, which is basically all that is meant by the term of being "one legged", yet you absolutely despise that term.
That said, are you, I, and others really any different in what we're teaching when it comes to weight transfer, then shift in the swing? We all seem to agree that more weight is "back" in or at the launch position ("not get to a 50/50" or anything "forward" of that), we all seem to agree that the weight/load should be in "your back (one) leg to stay back", but yet you argue that we're not on the same page when it comes to that...and honestly, until you said today that you "don't really mean a 50/50" I thought we weren't also. But now I'm beginning to think at least in that part of the swing sequence we're all pretty much saying the same things, just with a little bit different descriptive words is all.
So now I have to wonder if we were to get together in person, would our preferred bat paths be the same, but simply because of the inherent limitations of the written word of these forums...we're more or less arguing about the thing(s) we're all really teaching or doing the same. Hmmm...View attachment 13992