Not really negative but allows for weight to get forward yet back.So it forces a negative shift?
Not really negative but allows for weight to get forward yet back.So it forces a negative shift?
Of course, that what we all do. No harm no foulClem, continue to use your lens and I will use mine
Not really negative but allows for weight to get forward
So how does that not cause the player to lose the back side relationship. It sounds like you had the player simply move their COM forward in their setup and when they gather they have to push it to the back because other wise they would just fall forward.
So, now FYB is not sequence but is a Pass through position. That's what I'm getting at. You can't assume off of a partial clip that stops well short of "Leveraged" position and say it seems or appears that what they are doing is not going to allow them to get said "FYB" by your definition of it. IMO
I cut the Gif shorter, to show what I'm saying. Carpenter sure looks to be controlling with the rear leg
Like a step back drillI don't think of it as a negative move when teaching it.. I am looking for them to make the move and see how it ends while getting forward.. I haven't had to address a student who just falls forward after moving out yet. I think the mind/body tries to seek balance while getting forward.
Like a step back drill
Gotchya.I did that many years ago but it became an abaf movement after a few times of doing it.. I think the concept is similar but tough to control the timing.