FiveFrameSwing
Banned
Long levers do offer an advantage.
Not primary starter in college = does not pitch
The point is, they are on the roster. Ahead of a bunch of other girls who are 6' tall who were not asked to continue with softball after HS. Too many people want to limit a player based on size. It may be a disadvantage, but it doesn't mean size can't be overcome, just like being 6'2" and 185 doesn't mean you are guaranteed to be better.Yep. I know the 2 that you are referencing on the ASU roster and they certainly aren't called on to pitch. So, if you never pitch in a game, are you a pitcher? ASU's pitcher is 6'1 and her reliever is 6'2. UofA, would be about the same. Plus, these tall girls can hit, when called upon.
They are still part of a major college program, which means they have a shot at the starters job. Certainly a much better shot then the girl who believes that at 5'6" she won't be recruited by a major college.
I have seen pitchers that could throw 65 at the start of the 1st and drop to 55 at the end of the first and be at 50 after that, if not a little less.
I can imagine someone telling the moneyball guy he was wasteing his time with all his useless stats.
Yes, there are many intangeables in pitching, just as there is in any athletic activity, but don't be fooled, size does matter. Height, weight, and velocity are measureable.
Perhaps a chart like this would be good to pinpoint a girl who is underacheiving. I don't know how fast my dd throws but if I did I would like to know how she stacks up. IMHO, any parent/coach that would use a stat like this to disqualify a child at a young age has bigger issues than velocity.
I have seen a chart that shows how fast Jenny Finch threw at certain ages and that is amazing. I can imagine few equal her velocity but everyone can't be the best(that is not a justification for mediocrity, just a fact).
Good luck and please post your findings.