- Feb 3, 2011
- 1,880
- 48
I listened to a dad's appeal earlier today:
R1 on 1B
grounder to left of 2B
SS has difficulty collecting ball as she is falling down
SS secures ball in her throwing hand as she rolls over and touches 2B with her empty glove prior to R1 reaching bag
BU calls runner safe, because SS had touched the bag with a glove that did not contain the ball
Dad in the stands is livid, maintaining that, because it was a force play, then the empty glove tag of the bag was the same as if the player had merely stepped on 2B with the ball in her throwing hand.
I told him I was pretty sure the ball needed to be in the glove, but that the player could touch the bag with the ball hand and get that out.
I don't know any NSA rules, though, so I couldn't have too much of an argument. Is this dad correct?
R1 on 1B
grounder to left of 2B
SS has difficulty collecting ball as she is falling down
SS secures ball in her throwing hand as she rolls over and touches 2B with her empty glove prior to R1 reaching bag
BU calls runner safe, because SS had touched the bag with a glove that did not contain the ball
Dad in the stands is livid, maintaining that, because it was a force play, then the empty glove tag of the bag was the same as if the player had merely stepped on 2B with the ball in her throwing hand.
I told him I was pretty sure the ball needed to be in the glove, but that the player could touch the bag with the ball hand and get that out.
I don't know any NSA rules, though, so I couldn't have too much of an argument. Is this dad correct?