I wouldn't use either of those.
But if you have strike zone data, you can see which catchers get more pitches out of the zone called strikes and vice versa. There would be some noise with different umpires having different zones (and having umpire data would be great to have here), but knowing Catcher A leads NCAA catchers in framing certainly would be useful.
There is no reliable strike zone "data" at any level so when it is all said and done it is still based on subjective information. Becomes more opinion poll than objective stats. There far too many intangibles to try and quantify which catcher is better. Statistics are far more useful to those wearing pocket protectors as they drink a beer than those who actually make the decisions.
Last edited: