Batting average should only be a small part of evaluating a hitter. Especially because of the subjectivity of some scorekeepers. Hard hit balls and on base percentage are ones I look at more closely. Some weekends a girl could line out hard 3/4 times and another girls gets 3/4 hits on bloopers in the right spot. Hit the ball hard and don’t strike out a lot and you will keep most coaches happy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As far as GC goes though, you're just shifting the 'problem' to the opinion of what is or isn't a hard hit ball. At least if you go back and look at stats.But OBP rewards those bloopers.
To me it's hitting the ball hard and not striking out. Which is basically what you said too.
As far as GC goes though, you're just shifting the 'problem' to the opinion of what is or isn't a hard hit ball. At least if you go back and look at stats.
In my brief coaching career, I kept a journal after every game so I could remember certain details where I knew GC stats would let me down.
It's tough, but shouldn't sweat it. My DD is a slapper, which a good portion of that style is to make the opposing team have to play a tough bounce. When not trying to lift it to the outfield she is aiming 3' in front of the player she is targeting. She has more ROE than the rest of the team by far. But end of the day I tell her that it is what helps her team to be as successful as they are. Her job as a lead off hitter is to get on base and score runs. And she averages more than a run per game.
If someone were to judge you simply on a quick glance at your numbers, it's probably someone you shouldn't be playing for.
The NCAA Softball Scoring Guide says if the fielder is closer to home than the base at 1st or third it’s a hit no matter what fielder does.