Read my following posts where I say the same thing.I feel softball is becoming a sport for those with money. I know I couldn't afford to have my DD play travel ball nowadays.
Read my following posts where I say the same thing.I feel softball is becoming a sport for those with money. I know I couldn't afford to have my DD play travel ball nowadays.
I don't see why coaches have issues with a left-handed catcher? Think about it, it's easier to pick at 1B and easier to field a bunt and throw to 1B as a lefty. That thinking goes way back to baseball and most batters being right-handed. I wouldn't mind a LH catcher.
I'm not anti-lefty catcher, but it's pretty clearly a disadvantage in more scenarios (and more important scenarios) than it is an advantage (throws to third, throws to second because most batters are right-handed, and tag plays all come to mind immediately).
I look at it like this: Left-handed hitters are at an inherent advantage, but it doesn't mean you don't have righties in the lineup. It doesn't mean right-handed hitters can't be great. But the game is designed in such a way that a lefty hitter has an advantage. The same is true for a right-handed catcher. Doesn't mean you can't have a great left-handed catcher, and a coach shouldn't just dismiss a lefty catcher out of hand.
Outside of her 1st year of t-ball (where she played 1st because she was the only one who catch a ball thrown at her), my DD has played MI 99% of the time so in addition to the basic skills of catch grounders, throwing properly and catching fly balls I have worked with her on specific MI skills e.g. proper (shorter) arm action when throwing (this still needs work ) , DP feeds and turns, proper angles to take on balls, etc. I have been doing this since she was maybe 8. Right now when she fields a GB in the OF she fields it like an INF and throws it like an INF but should she be on a team where she is needed in the OF for whatever reason, the outside of team practice work would shift to concentrate on that.Most of the feedback in these posts are talking about young players developing.
However there is a second part of this post regarding
Goals.
Talking about what are people intending on doing.
What age do most make a specific decision.
Obviously if a single sport kid is far superior atI agree with this 100% but let me play devil's advocate for a minute. Many college coaches will say this, but who are they recruiting; the single sport player that has spent 100s of more hours practicing their skill set or the (many times) inferior multi-sport athlete because they were busy practicing and playing another sport instead of working on the sport they're trying to get recruited to play?
Before anyone starts to take me to task over this question, remember please that I'm playing devil's advocate. I also said many and not most or all athletes. I know more than my share of multi-sport athletes that can compete against top single sport SB players. Also, I know that all things being equal, the coach will pick the MSA over the SSA.