- Jun 22, 2008
- 3,438
- 48
I really hate this rule as it has so many interpretations. The more I read about it, the more confusing it becomes.
It is not that confusing. Just too many people overthink it and believe they must be right.
My understanding of the rule was if a runner rounds a base and does not stop on the base itself and the pitcher has the ball in the circle, the runner may stop once and immediately continue to advance to the next base or immediately return to the previous base.
See how simple that is?
If the pitcher fakes a throw or throws to a plate, the LBR does not apply and even if the runner stopped once already, they may attempt to run again...
I have no idea what you mean. However, simple version: If the pitcher makes a play on any runner, the LBR is not applicable to any runner.
I was also under the impression that the LBR "reset" itself after every base taken, so a runner could stop once between 1B and 2B, once again between 2B and 3B, and once again between 3B and HB. I could be mistaken so please feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
Okay, you are wrong. The runner must proceed to the next base or previous base. That's it. What you are suggesting is part of the BS that cause the rule to be initiated.
I really want to know exactly how to interpret this rule so if it is incorrectly called (as stated so many times above) that I am factual and have the knowledge to contest it.
The only real issue is the judgment of the umpire as to what s/he may consider "immediate". Many umpires are trained to count to "2" and then make the call.
I wish they would get rid of the rule, it is unnecessary. Actually talked to a handful of college and JO umpires and went over a proposed change to eliminate the out, just kill the ball and put the runners back on the last base touched. It never got out of committee.