Mocoso - I have experienced this from both sides and it can be equally ugly from the parent and coaches perspective. Having attended many rec league all-star drafts, very few (if any) are really 100% fair. Since the managers and board almost always have kids in the league, they make backroom deals to get their kids on the higher all-star team. The other parents see this and cry foul but nothing really changes each year. The primary reasons you want your kid on the better all-star team is a) the coaching is generally better (i.e. they are more experienced, better instruction), you are playing with more talented group of girls that push your kid to get better (playing time competition); 3) you have an opportunity to qualify for State and National tournaments (unlike the second or third all-star teams), and d) your competition is going to be better. Having a daughter that played mostly on the higher all-star teams I can say unequivocally that the experience is far superior to being on the second team, where some players may not even be able to catch and throw the ball, the pitching is weak, and the coaches are inexperienced. It has nothing to do with being recruited when you are in High School but everything to do with having a challenging and awesome experience no matter what level of ball you play. Are some parents absolutely crazy? Yes, but the vast majority are frustrated because they see little suzy work hard and get passed up because of daddy ball. Happens every year, in every league.
Yep Im fully aware of the other side of the coin and I can understand parents being frustrated.. ! I just dont get the "we wont play" as a response.. this isnt Suzy deciding, its the parent's ego making the decision for her... If you had a kid that wasnt as good take your spot.. play for the Silver and shine so brightly that everyone will see and know the decision on the other kid was the wrong one..