He is always talking about the hands being linear, nothing linear about the swings I posted. He also said Mankin was wrong, Mankin was/is correct. And he came to his conclusion on a VCR, we now have computers to break the swing down.
I am not fond of this swing. I believe this might work for a few big strong guys but smaller girls never. They need some lateral momentum. And if Judge would swing more like J.D. he would hit the ball much further. IMO
He is always talking about the hands being linear, nothing linear about the swings I posted. He also said Mankin was wrong, Mankin was/is correct. And he came to his conclusion on a VCR, we now have computers to break the swing down.
I don't see a big difference between hand/forearm usage at launch between all 3 swings, agree? So either AJ isn't listening to TM with regards to this or, as I have alluded to previously, it is difficult to discern whether somebody is torquing the handle, either intentionally or "unintentionally" (due to a different swing thought) from video of a player taking a full swing at a moving ball. It isn't going to look like the static drills that everybody associates with "handle torque".Does the handle get torqued? Maybe.. but I don’t think it’s intentional
Around the 6:40 mark he says" I like the way you keep the shoulders square and just use your hands" and then the next swing his shoulders are wide open. The feel vs the real is still alive and well.I enjoyed the spring training video W=W posted, those guys are having a blast.
6:40 is a great example of how what a hitter thinks he is doing isn’t what he is really doing. “Level approach“ indeed.
I have no idea about the handle being torqued, lol