I've been wondering about this one since not every girl that plays gets to be a national powerhouse team because of a variety or reasons. I would love to hear some opinions, especially from ex-players and parents of ex-players.
There seems to a trend in the area that I live in for teams to be part of a big organization. So you have a conglomeration of teams from 8U - 18 Gold (in each age group) that fly under the same team umbrella so to speak. I wonder how big of an advantage this is over a good independent team. One advantage of the big org is they are able to bring together a bunch of different teams for big workouts to learn from other people across the scope of teams and they seem to be able to bring in college coaches for clinics for the org only. Good recognition for players. It appears that college coaches go to the manager of the org to get opinions on players and who they might want to look at.
On the other hand, does playing on a not so sucessful org team do better than a good independent?
I assume that having a team that plays showcase events and attending camps helps.
Thoughts?
There seems to a trend in the area that I live in for teams to be part of a big organization. So you have a conglomeration of teams from 8U - 18 Gold (in each age group) that fly under the same team umbrella so to speak. I wonder how big of an advantage this is over a good independent team. One advantage of the big org is they are able to bring together a bunch of different teams for big workouts to learn from other people across the scope of teams and they seem to be able to bring in college coaches for clinics for the org only. Good recognition for players. It appears that college coaches go to the manager of the org to get opinions on players and who they might want to look at.
On the other hand, does playing on a not so sucessful org team do better than a good independent?
I assume that having a team that plays showcase events and attending camps helps.
Thoughts?