- Feb 3, 2016
- 502
- 43
So I've watched a couple scenarios play out.
Some of these are by State.
The USSSA director for TX.. I've looked at a team that won like 100% of the 38 or 43 games in "B" and had 50 % win percentage in "A" games played and hadn't been moved to "A".
That tells me that the TX Director wants a TX team to win TX State Tournaments and possibly bring home a National Championship in "B".
Other State directors seem to move any team winning a tournament to "A".
So depending on the team pool size for a respective area that could be good or bad.
Every classification should have a number one team that is the best in C,B. In bigger markets moving teams is a good thing. Trying to do that in limited markets could essentially end a teams season as previously mentioned. Not all teams can travel out of state looking for competition every weekend. Fund limited.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Some of these are by State.
The USSSA director for TX.. I've looked at a team that won like 100% of the 38 or 43 games in "B" and had 50 % win percentage in "A" games played and hadn't been moved to "A".
That tells me that the TX Director wants a TX team to win TX State Tournaments and possibly bring home a National Championship in "B".
Other State directors seem to move any team winning a tournament to "A".
So depending on the team pool size for a respective area that could be good or bad.
Every classification should have a number one team that is the best in C,B. In bigger markets moving teams is a good thing. Trying to do that in limited markets could essentially end a teams season as previously mentioned. Not all teams can travel out of state looking for competition every weekend. Fund limited.
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk