- Apr 1, 2010
- 1,673
- 0
That's a good point that parents or players may not consider. Two seasons ago, I had 4 girls who wanted to play catcher, and all were pretty decent. We settled on two catchers and moved the others to SS and 2B. The decision wasn't based on 'who are our two best catchers?' It was based on what would produce the best overall defense. If I've got a girl who is a B+ catcher but C+ everywhere else, then she's likely to be the catcher over the girl who is A- at catcher and every other position.
DD's coach also had 4 catchers. He turned the fast one into a SS, the tall one into a 1B, the lefty with decent speed into a backup C/OF/backup 2B/backup 1B and DD is a catcher/backup 3B. IMO the coaches who turned DD into a catcher and the ones who left her there did the right thing. My child loved playing second base and defensive pitcher back in rec, but she just doesn't have the lateral speed to play middle infield at the TB level. She's worked very hard to make herself a good catcher, which is a position more suited for her body type and speed.
The girls who really can play every position are lucky. However, I'm glad that softball can accomodate many different types of girls. A girl may have to give up her favorite position based on her speed, size or the needs of the team, but there's a place for everyone who's willing to work. That's simply not the case in most sports I see.