- Feb 3, 2011
- 1,880
- 48
ASA
Have you ever had a game where both teams protested? Well, I can now check that off my "bucket" list.
Situation: A few anonymous tips came in before a semifinal that a player had switched uniforms after her team was eliminated Sunday morning. She was listed as a substitute on the lineup card with her correct name. During the 2nd inning, she entered the game to run for the catcher. Following the next at-bat, a series of events followed which involved the site director having to verify rosters and resolution with the TD's staff during the same time as the umpire was notified of our protest. Play continued as it took some time to get all the necessary verifications, which were then reported back to the umpire who informed the opposing coach of the determination. The local rules dictate that a player may not play for 2 different teams in the same tournament. At that point - and this is 2nd-hand information that was relayed to me by the site director - the opposing coach had been directed via phone by the TD to surrender the game, but elected not to do so and wanted to continue coaching.
This is where things got even weirder. Once the forfeit was announced by the PU and play was stopped, the opposing coach said that he wanted to protest our roster, too. Yes, #1 is not on our official team roster and will not enter Championship Play with us, but she and another player were properly brought on as guest players for the weekend due to injuries. Their home team was not entered in this tournament and they played all 6 games with us. We followed the rules. Even though the offending team had been disqualified, if it was determined that we, too, had used an illegal player, then we were subject to disqualification as well and the 2 teams in the other semifinal would've been champion and runner-up, by default.
Of course their protest was denied, but not for the reason you might think. Even though our players were all legal, because the other coach had refused to surrender at the time he was supposed to, the final ruling was that he'd waived his right to protest with that action. And thus, the case was closed....at least until the other message board caught wind of the affair.
Have you ever had a game where both teams protested? Well, I can now check that off my "bucket" list.
Situation: A few anonymous tips came in before a semifinal that a player had switched uniforms after her team was eliminated Sunday morning. She was listed as a substitute on the lineup card with her correct name. During the 2nd inning, she entered the game to run for the catcher. Following the next at-bat, a series of events followed which involved the site director having to verify rosters and resolution with the TD's staff during the same time as the umpire was notified of our protest. Play continued as it took some time to get all the necessary verifications, which were then reported back to the umpire who informed the opposing coach of the determination. The local rules dictate that a player may not play for 2 different teams in the same tournament. At that point - and this is 2nd-hand information that was relayed to me by the site director - the opposing coach had been directed via phone by the TD to surrender the game, but elected not to do so and wanted to continue coaching.
This is where things got even weirder. Once the forfeit was announced by the PU and play was stopped, the opposing coach said that he wanted to protest our roster, too. Yes, #1 is not on our official team roster and will not enter Championship Play with us, but she and another player were properly brought on as guest players for the weekend due to injuries. Their home team was not entered in this tournament and they played all 6 games with us. We followed the rules. Even though the offending team had been disqualified, if it was determined that we, too, had used an illegal player, then we were subject to disqualification as well and the 2 teams in the other semifinal would've been champion and runner-up, by default.
Of course their protest was denied, but not for the reason you might think. Even though our players were all legal, because the other coach had refused to surrender at the time he was supposed to, the final ruling was that he'd waived his right to protest with that action. And thus, the case was closed....at least until the other message board caught wind of the affair.
Last edited: