- Sep 26, 2015
- 13
- 0
My DD is an out-of-state freshman position player recruit going to a Power 5 Big State U. The program makes the NCAA's almost every year usually as an at large, but has trouble making it past the first round.
Coach and program have great reputations, and I am confident this stability will last long after daughter's playing career. The coach brings in a large recruit class every year, 2016 and 2017 posted verbal classes are large. Since I have been watching the program, the roster is 2/3 freshmen and sophomores every year. With limited data points I think most girls received a quarter scholarship offer (a strong position recruit who is also a pitcher told my DD, like her, she received only a quarter). Daughter was told her partial was guaranteed for four years with the possibility it could increase.
This possibility of a scholarship increase, is it more than just recruiting fluff? Does a freshman starter who hits at the top of the lineup usually receives a big increase? Where is the line usually drawn? A freshman who finds a starting position at the end of the season and bats in the bottom of the line-up? - or - A freshman who comes off of the bench first to pinch run or hit and has a good chance to start next year?
Any anecdotal observations about players in similar situations would be greatly appreciated.
Coach and program have great reputations, and I am confident this stability will last long after daughter's playing career. The coach brings in a large recruit class every year, 2016 and 2017 posted verbal classes are large. Since I have been watching the program, the roster is 2/3 freshmen and sophomores every year. With limited data points I think most girls received a quarter scholarship offer (a strong position recruit who is also a pitcher told my DD, like her, she received only a quarter). Daughter was told her partial was guaranteed for four years with the possibility it could increase.
This possibility of a scholarship increase, is it more than just recruiting fluff? Does a freshman starter who hits at the top of the lineup usually receives a big increase? Where is the line usually drawn? A freshman who finds a starting position at the end of the season and bats in the bottom of the line-up? - or - A freshman who comes off of the bench first to pinch run or hit and has a good chance to start next year?
Any anecdotal observations about players in similar situations would be greatly appreciated.