- Jul 17, 2012
- 1,086
- 38
Frozen, if I may, I'd like to counter this argument for the sake of discussion.
Bill, I'm starting to think you dislike me. I didn't mean to step on any toes here. If your point to me was that kids CAN learn to pitch with the proper mechanics without being shown how...then I'll agree. You're obviously living proof. I just don't believe that it's the best way to approach teaching a young athlete how to perform the windmill pitch. Why leave it up to them to figure it out on their own? In my limited experience, I've seen enough "proof" to convince me that there is a better way.
And for the record...my daughter has never even heard of the term "I/R". She never heard me use any anatomical terms. We refer to elbows, wrists, upper arm and lower arm. We talk about bending, turning, and twisting, not adduction, supination, and flexion. I like to put things into terms a 10/11 year old can relate to.....so the point of those that are suggesting the "KISS" method, I couldn't agree more. You CAN teach the high level motion without making it excessively confusing. The point I was making in my original post that you responded to is that it's not something that's just going to happen automatically for the vast majority of kids. It's not "Natural". When I say natural, I'm not referring to the biomechanical motions of the body. I'm talking about the act of throwing a ball underhand.