TB players choose to be on a specific team and are selected by that team based on their abilities. It is a mutually beneficial situation.
HS players are more or less a hostage to a school/program based on their home address. Good or bad HS coaches must play the hand they are dealt. For both it is a situation based on circumstance, not choice.
Comparing the two is apples to oranges.
I would add that when players have no choice (due to home address and school boundary), there is a tendency for some coach(es) to develop a "god complex." I believe having choice is always better than having no choice. Competition for players brings about better coaching than when there is no choice. Not just better coaching in terms of how the game is played, but better in terms of keeping narcissistic tendencies under control.
Last edited: