For ASA softball tournament:
Opposing team's pitcher reached base, team ran out a courtesy runner. The courtesy runner was a player that had started in CF, but was subsequently subbed for and on the bench. Courtesy runner was standing on first base while pitcher back in dugout. Clearly, this is an illegal substitution, and we were ready to appeal.
However, the plate umpire called the opposing coach over and informed him he did not have a legal sub available to use as a courtesy runner for the pitcher. The pitcher went back to run at first base and the game continued.
The question - did the umpire act improperly by stopping the opposing coach from making an illegal substitution? Our contention is that he should have allowed the substitution, which we would have appealed, making the base runner out and resulting in ejection (?) of opposing coach.
Opposing team's pitcher reached base, team ran out a courtesy runner. The courtesy runner was a player that had started in CF, but was subsequently subbed for and on the bench. Courtesy runner was standing on first base while pitcher back in dugout. Clearly, this is an illegal substitution, and we were ready to appeal.
However, the plate umpire called the opposing coach over and informed him he did not have a legal sub available to use as a courtesy runner for the pitcher. The pitcher went back to run at first base and the game continued.
The question - did the umpire act improperly by stopping the opposing coach from making an illegal substitution? Our contention is that he should have allowed the substitution, which we would have appealed, making the base runner out and resulting in ejection (?) of opposing coach.