- May 13, 2023
- 1,538
- 113
i do understand, like that you are adding definition to this discussionI am trying to follow what you are saying (really I am) and relating it back to the conversation and what I was trying to say so .....yes if you look at a tournament and would feel elated if you could keep from getting run-ruled every game you probably shouldn't play that either..Is that what you are talking about when you are saying "play to win" in regards to setting the schedule (eg the topic we are talking about..)??
It may just be me, but there have been some tournaments DD has played in where winning the whole thing was more of a relief than anything else...Understand?
What you are describing is the type of events to put the team in where there is a happy medium of competition win loss.Then brings up the discussion of what the happy medium is of the outcome of games win/loss.
Everyone can come up with what they would look for at the years end of a win-loss record. imo should include there will be losses in the books because the team should be playing competitive games. It is good to have challenge.