Ernie Banks?
interesting for me..... I've had many discussions ref this same subject. Argument for Open/Close is Ernie Banks teaches it and many pitchers years back have been very successful. How do you argue against success?
Interesting. Except pitching is no different than hitting in many aspects.
Ernie was not a pitcher, he was teaching based on what he thought he saw others doing.
And hitting coaches used to teach what they THOUGHT they were seeing too (squish the bug, etc.) then with advent of slow mo cameras, RVP, Dartfish, etc. we are seeing that is NOT what the great pitchers are actually doing. Or hitters. So, they have to relearn what the people were actually doing.
Part of the problem here is we all define what is a successful pitcher by different standards. In year's past, only the best of the best got to play in college. Yet, today... nearly every college has a program and almost anyone who wants to can play in college at some level. Yet the stigma still applies that "she played in college so she must be VERY good". Maybe I hold my standards too high but I just don't see that as a major criteria anymore. And I still say the lack of quality hitting makes average pitchers look good. And that is going to change as the technology is improving for hitting training.
Bill
Pitchers who tend to keep the hips open at ball release put a tremendous amount of stress on the throwing shoulder.
All true. Also we need to consider physical gifts. Just because a 6 footer is successful doesn't mean she's necessarily efficient. Again, why I'd suggest looking at the smaller girls who are effective as proof of concept.