- Jan 25, 2011
- 2,278
- 38
I beleave the umpire was just letting the coach know who was in charge,sounds like both coach and umpire need to mark there territory
The home team, at bat, was ahead when time expired. The visitors cannot bat again. The game is over.
Why would anyone insist that play continue? For what purpose? The umpire should have called game over, not finish the inning. Imagine an umpire in the major league telling a team they had to finish the inning because they didn't have three outs yet.
Coach needs to read "Human Communication for Dummies".
Coach was right, but his failure to communicate properly in an emotionally mature and professional manner caused him quite a bit of embarrassment. In this world, right and wrong mean nothing, perception is everything.
-W