Final cuts at this time of year are always difficult. We have one spot to fill and basically two girls (there are more but they don't have as much talent) challenging for it. One of the girls has been on this team acouple years ago in 16U and is a reasonably good player but an excellent team mate. Always does what is asked etc and accepts her role that when it comes down to it, she probably won't be one of the 9 on the field. The other is a new girl from a neighboring town but brings with her a kind of "edge". She has been somewhat rude at the tryouts that she has been at but at this age (18U) is she trying to assert herself? The "leaders" on the team have spoken to me and expressed their thoughts. They understand that the coaches have the last say but felt that they had to let me know of their feelings about this second girl.
The second girl brings more talent, but the attitude (that I have witnessed when she played with another team) might be enough to upset the chemistry of the team which is excellent. This girl isn't so good that she makes the difference between winning a national or not, but is significantly more talented than the other.
So my question to the coaches on the forum is this........Would you sacrifice a known for an unknown? Would you sacrifice team chemistry for one kid with more talent? How do you rate chemistry vs talent? I have coached teams (basically this one in 16U) that was limited in talent, but came a long way with being a team and feeding off another's success thereby breeding more success. At 17-18 yoa that is difficult to achieve though as the girls bring a totally different dynamic to the field.
Softball is a team sport and therefore I have to weight the consideration in that favor but the talent difference is that clear. Any thoughts/comments would be appreciated.
The second girl brings more talent, but the attitude (that I have witnessed when she played with another team) might be enough to upset the chemistry of the team which is excellent. This girl isn't so good that she makes the difference between winning a national or not, but is significantly more talented than the other.
So my question to the coaches on the forum is this........Would you sacrifice a known for an unknown? Would you sacrifice team chemistry for one kid with more talent? How do you rate chemistry vs talent? I have coached teams (basically this one in 16U) that was limited in talent, but came a long way with being a team and feeding off another's success thereby breeding more success. At 17-18 yoa that is difficult to achieve though as the girls bring a totally different dynamic to the field.
Softball is a team sport and therefore I have to weight the consideration in that favor but the talent difference is that clear. Any thoughts/comments would be appreciated.
Last edited: