- Jun 22, 2008
- 3,438
- 48
The point of the rule is that with less than two outs in this lone, rare situation the runner from third would not be placed back on his "time of pitch" base. It's not really addressing whether or not the run scores when there are two outs (it doesn't), as the misinformed poster on the LL forum is claiming.
I can only guess that it's because on this play any subsequent interference by the batter-runner would have had zero effect on play at home. The runner has already crossed the plate and the defense has already had their unimpeded chance to retire him.
It's an oddball situation that I can honestly say I have never seen come up in any game.
Why TOP? Why not TOI?