Lower Back

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

May 16, 2010
1,083
38
Look... I posed an experiment, you responded with comments that it was abduction and adduciton. I went with that and am asking some follow up based on your answer. This has nothing to do with "explaining it" whatever you think that is.

I am asking you (the expert) specific questions about a movement that you said was happening. Is it really that hard to address the questions that are asked instead of making it about something else?

Your experiment is not one that fits good scientific criteria. You have too many muscles activated all at the same time, and your body is not subject to the same physics forces of a swing. You may think so, but the subtle differences make a huge difference.

I've told you over and over. The back leg applies a pushing force into the bottom of the pelvis which makes it move forward and begin to rotate. Once the weight shifts to the front foot, the pelvis PULLS on the back leg as the pelvis rotates, and the back leg then internally rotates as it is pulled forward. The internal rotation phase is not supplying power to continue the torso rotation. The power came prior to that.
 
Aug 28, 2012
457
0
I know what you've told me over and over, I am not asking about that.

when I get in an athletic batting stance like in my experiment in the rear leg thread, and I adduct my rear leg to get to the "knock-kneed" position like you said here
From the position that you describe; Moving to knock-kneed is an adduction movement of the femur, and moving the knee out is abduction. To internally rotate, or externally rotate from that position, the foot must pivot.

and like Stanton is doing here (please confirm if you see his preswing action here as adduction)
Stanton_BP_1.gif


when I am in that stance and using the muscles that adduct to create the movement... what is happening to the femur position in the socket with respect to being IR'd or ER'd? Does it stay neutral the whole time? Does it have a range of being in an IR'd position when my leg is max adducted and being in an ER'd position when my leg is max abducted?

I am thinking that when one adducts while in that stance and their hip joint is in a flexed position, that the femur also attains a position of being in an IR'd position relative to the socket but would like some confirmation. As an expert on such matters, can you please let me know if I am thinking about this correctly or not. Thank you!

--NoonTime
 
R

RayR

Guest
Sticks and stones, Love.

It happens from abduction and external rotation of the leg. I've said it many times. You can deny it from a point of ignorance, all you wish. Maybe someday, you'll understand it.

Every strength coach, physical therapist, bio-mechanist, and MD in the world knows that abduction of the femur when standing, moves the torso, but you don't believe it. IMO, that makes you look kind of foolish. Abduction is initiated by contraction of muscles that connect the pelvic bone to the femur.
 
May 16, 2010
1,083
38
I know what you've told me over and over, I am not asking about that.

when I get in an athletic batting stance like in my experiment in the rear leg thread, and I adduct my rear leg to get to the "knock-kneed" position like you said here


and like Stanton is doing here (please confirm if you see his preswing action here as adduction)
Stanton_BP_1.gif


when I am in that stance and using the muscles that adduct to create the movement... what is happening to the femur position in the socket with respect to being IR'd or ER'd? Does it stay neutral the whole time? Does it have a range of being in an IR'd position when my leg is max adducted and being in an ER'd position when my leg is max abducted?

I am thinking that when one adducts while in that stance and their hip joint is in a flexed position, that the femur also attains a position of being in an IR'd position relative to the socket but would like some confirmation. As an expert on such matters, can you please let me know if I am thinking about this correctly or not. Thank you!

--NoonTime

The little kick-in that he did with his back knee, is adduction while the hip and knee are flexed.

He then shifts weight onto his back foot and kicks his front knee and hip inward, which puts his REAR hip into a flexed and INTERNALLY rotated position. When he starts to swing, he abducts the rear femur and it also moves to an EXTERNALLY rotated position as his rear heel lifts. After his rear heel lifts, his femur is adducted and internally rotated back to the neutral position. The adduction and internal rotation occurs during the unweighting process that occurs after the abduction and external rotation shifted the torso to the front foot.

Once the back heel comes up the push from the back is nearly complete. The adduction and IR is not supplying force. Some force may still be applied after the heel comes up, from a contraction of the gluteus maximus that is applying an extension force to the femur.

All of this causes force to be applied to the front foot. The Earth pushes force back, up through the front leg and applies force into the front hip socket. This completes the pelvic rotation.
 
Last edited:
Aug 1, 2008
2,314
63
ohio
It happens from abduction and external rotation of the leg. I've said it many times. You can deny it from a point of ignorance, all you wish. Maybe someday, you'll understand it.

Every strength coach, physical therapist, bio-mechanist, and MD in the world knows that abduction of the femur when standing, moves the torso, but you don't believe it. IMO, that makes you look kind of foolish. Abduction is initiated by contraction of muscles that connect the pelvic bone to the femur.




Jbooth
Can you answer my question in post 33
Laymens terms



Thanks
SL
 
Aug 28, 2012
457
0
The little kick-in that he did with his back knee, is adduction while the hip and knee are flexed.

Great thank you. How about the rest of my question? When I adduct in that flexed position, does the femur also IR? If so, how much. Ballpark some amount of degrees if you will.
 
R

RayR

Guest
Booth you are just being difficult now....all because of ego.

You know and I know and anyone with half a mind knows that there is a distinct difference between adduction with a bent leg and internally rotating the femur in the context of batting....

But, instead of answering Noon's questions you duck and dive and dodge and dip and dodge....and call me names....

The little kick-in that he did with his back knee, is adduction while the hip and knee are flexed.

He then shifts weight onto his back foot and kicks his front knee and hip inward, which puts his REAR hip into a flexed and INTERNALLY rotated position. When he starts to swing, he abducts the rear femur and it also moves to an EXTERNALLY rotated position as his rear heel lifts. After his rear heel lifts, his femur is adducted and internally rotated back to the neutral position. The adduction and internal rotation occurs during the unweighting process that occurs after the abduction and external rotation shifted the torso to the front foot.

Once the back heel comes up the push from the back is nearly complete. The adduction and IR is not supplying force. Some force may still be applied after the heel comes up, from a contraction of the gluteus maximus that is applying an extension force to the femur.

All of this causes force to be applied to the front foot. The Earth pushes force back, up through the front leg and applies force into the front hip socket. This completes the pelvic rotation.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,857
Messages
680,288
Members
21,527
Latest member
Ying
Top