Here you go. These are the case plays from the 2011 Case Book involving Rule 6.1
RULE 6- PITCHING (FAST PITCH)
PLAY 6.1-1
Fl takes the signal with the hands separated, the non-pivot foot behind and within the 24-inch of the pitcher’s plate, and starts the pitch with the foot behind the pitcher’s plate.
RULING: This is illegal for all Female FP games. All preliminaries before the pitch must be done with both on the pitcher’s plate. In Male FP games, this is legal. Preliminaries are identical but the non- pivot foot may be on or behind the pitcher’s plate. (6- IA-D)
PLAY 6.1-2
Fl takes a signal while standing behind the pitcher’s plate. Fl then assumes a legal pitching position, pauses with the hands apart then brings them together and pitches the ball.
RULING: Legal pitch. Fl must only appear to be taking the signal while legally in contact with the pitcher’s plate. (6-ID)
PLAY 6.1-3
May Fl take the pitching position with the hands already together?
RULING: No, this is illegal. Fl’s hands must be apart when stepping onto the pitcher’s plate and
while taking the signal. An illegal pitch should be called as soon as the violation occurs. (6-IA)
PLAY 6.1-4
In all Male FP, Fl takes a signal with hands separated and simultaneously steps backward while bringing the hands together.
RULING: LegaL Male pitchers can step backwards before, during or after bringing the hands together. (6-1E[lj)
Reading too much into rules is not uncommon among those involved in the game, including umpires. This is why some umpires hesitate prior to making rulings as they are reviewing the play mentally. Same with rules. You read them, hear them repeated at clinics and still you need to stop and think about when applying them and sometimes things are considered that shouldn't be.
For example, until a few years ago, the D3K rule in the ASA book was incorrect. It addressed the application of the rule when there were less than 2 outs and no runner on first and when there were 2 outs and a runner on first, but the wording was so specific it ignored a situation with 2 outs and no runner on first base. It was an oversight and no one ever questioned it, but it was probably overlooked in haste to make sure the wording was right for the 2-out exception with runners on first. When brought to the attention of the National Umpire Staff a few years ago, it was changed to read as it does presently.
Rules can be tough, but are not stand alone items. The rules complement each other and not only does the book need to be viewed as a single unit, but schools, clinics, case books and constant clarifications are necessary to keep up with the game and it can be maddening.
Thanks, the 1 sec. pause I always believed was a part of the rule, and ignored, is in fact not a part of the rule.