Cannonball
Ex "Expert"
- Feb 25, 2009
- 4,896
- 113
So, co head coaches and, if I get the drift, one gets upset enough to leave the dugout. What then happened? We don't know. Was one coach acting like THE Head Coach and making all of the decisions without talking to the other HC? Was politics being played and the one HC angry to watch it happen? We don't know. Was there some verbal conflict where it was better for the one to leave instead of making a scene in front of the players? We don't know. Was there some type of agreement made between these two coaches long before the games started that was violated? We don't know. We don't know much at all in this scenario.
Personally, I don't think it is wise to have two head coaches and I don't think it wise to just merge teams. In my experience that never works out well. I do know this, I would not do well in a situation where I made suggestions based upon agreements and then ignored. It would be better if I left the dugout though, lets face it, I would raise all types of hell.
Personally, I don't think it is wise to have two head coaches and I don't think it wise to just merge teams. In my experience that never works out well. I do know this, I would not do well in a situation where I made suggestions based upon agreements and then ignored. It would be better if I left the dugout though, lets face it, I would raise all types of hell.