Saddest thing is that it is usually just a coaching problem, not the girls fault. Sub-average athletic ability girls can still be very competitive with good coaching.
Runs scored should NOT be used as a tiebreaker in tournaments.It promotes an unnecessary dilemma for coaches. That being said, I'd lose a higher seed before I ran a score up to get a better seed. There plenty of other criteria available.Head to head, runs allowed, coin flip)Try to think of games against vastly inferior competition as a learning experience for the other team.This is a pretty good thread. Had a couple thoughts.
One of the things that sometimes makes this tricky is tournament play. What to do on Saturday's when every run counts. And on top of that, if you only have two stud pitchers minimizing innings during a tournament is important so every mercy game can be important. It's hard to keep bashing another team and when you're up 13-0 but a 15-0 mercy can be important in the middle of a summer tournament. Also hard to blame the tournament coordinator about the talent at the tournaments. My daughter's team played in a bunch of B tournaments this year but in reality we were a non recruited A level team. It happens sometimes. The girls have played together for 4 years. Good coaching and very good pitching/offense/defense. We placed 2nd in the B states in NY and lost to an A team that won a bunch of A tourny's this year. We lost 6-2 and had already beaten another A recruited team in the State semis. Point is, I've seen very bad A teams at A tourny's that should be playing B level and very good B teams at B tourny's that should be at A level. The coordinator is just taking the teams as they sign up.
I don't think anyone would fault a coach for getting to the mercy run differential and a little more. It's what happens after that that would be in question.
Agreed...I'd say these discussions would only apply after a mercy differential has been reached. I wouldn't expect the winning team to purposely extend the game.