Clock management...what would you have done?

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

osagedr

Canadian Fastpitch Dad
Oct 20, 2016
280
28
I do not like playing the clock, vast majority of teams we play do not either. Always a clever person out there though, they can do what they want but DD is not playing for them.

I agree with this.
 

Axe

Jul 7, 2011
459
18
Atlanta
DD2 team was playing in a Qualifier this past weekend. Game was close to over (hour and 40 min game). Other team had 2 outs and runner on 2nd. Their coach had runner step off so they could start a new inning. Well even though we were up 7-1, the run rule was in effect and the game was over. Kind of sucky way to end the game.

Oops! Clock mismanagement.

We had a team a few weeks that was behind 6 runs with 2 minutes on the clock (we were home) and they were having trouble getting the last out of the inning. The coach got frustrated and changed pitchers. By the time the new pitcher came in, warmed up and threw 1 pitch to our batter the game was over. They had basically given up. Very strange end to a championship game.
 
May 4, 2014
200
28
So Cal
ah the clock management question/debate...... my response is always "Last I checked college softball and baseball DO NOT use a clock".. time limits are there for the benefit of the tournament directors and leagues so they can get as many games as possible in a limited timeframe... its a necessary evil but if you CHOOSE to take advantage of the clock to secure a win you are cheating the kids of the pure set of rules by which it was intended to be played ...

I admit I dont always have the strength and will to NOT do so in certain cases ...if its the semifinal against a strong team and you are winning by one and the top of their lineup is coming up yes its extremely tempting to do so and yes Ill sound like a hypocrite and say Ive done it...but when I see a coach that is winning by 7 start doing the "time management" crap 40 minutes into a 1:20 no new game that is plain BUSH LEAGUE..
 
May 16, 2016
946
93
With tying run on 3rd, and winning run on 2nd, getting the out is most important. You could easily run out time, and still lose game, and wish you had not killed clock, so you have another at bat. If there were 2 outs with no runners on, then yes, killing clock would be good idea.
 

marriard

Not lost - just no idea where I am
Oct 2, 2011
4,319
113
Florida
ah the clock management question/debate...... my response is always "Last I checked college softball and baseball DO NOT use a clock".. time limits are there for the benefit of the tournament directors and leagues so they can get as many games as possible in a limited timeframe... its a necessary evil but if you CHOOSE to take advantage of the clock to secure a win you are cheating the kids of the pure set of rules by which it was intended to be played ...


Disagree here... first this isn't college softball or high school softball - it is travel softball. They made the clock part of travel, so it is now part of the game and that is how travel softball is intended to be played and it makes a difference in how the game and tournament should be played as well.

They might not have a clock in college, but they are also not expecting to play anywhere between 3 and 8 games in a day either. Also when you look out there be assured that most of the players on your travel team will not play in college so what happens X years from now doesn't really concern me in any way on game day (on practice days and showcase days, yes it does but that is not what we are talking about). Also I know my travel girls learn 7 inning games in high school which is much closer to the college experience, so they can learn that there.

We played 16 hours of softball in 100 degree heat in a losers bracket in ASA a couple of weeks ago. You can be absolutely assured that we played the clock hard. I owe it to my pitchers, my catchers and the team to do so.

A couple of seasons ago, we only had one strong pitcher for a weekend (the other was injured). We absolutely managed the clock and sneaking in innings for our #3 over the 5 games on elimination day we played (note pool games we just played - I wont manage a clock in a pool game unless by winning we avoid the dawn/8am game or if elimination is starting the same day and I am unsure how many games we are going to be asked to play.

So will I do bush league things like untied shoelaces or making up time wasting situations - no. But if I have 3 more back-to-back games to go and I can avoid my pitcher having to throw another inning in THIS game when she may have 12 more to throw, you bet I will. It is situational and I am more than OK with it when I feel it is the right thing to do.

Adding: Families are playing a lot of money to play on these teams. I want to make sure they get value for their $$$. That means more games and deeper into the tournament where possible. A whole new game for the parents and players to enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Nov 26, 2010
4,786
113
Michigan
Here was my situation this weekend, we were the visitors, up 1 run with 2 outs, runners on 2nd and 3rd, and about 2 minutes left on the clock (1:20 no new). Would you kill the clock so if you get that last out the game is over?

I let it play out and we got the out but there was 10 seconds left so we had to play another inning. We ended up losing.

I appreciate the feedback.

I assume you were in the field at the time. Knowing that it was an important game. Yes I would have worked the clock. At least one conference with the pitcher to tell her to slow down would have been enough. I don't like the clock, but when its there and there are rules to follow I feel obligated as the coach to use those rules to my advantage.
 
Mar 3, 2015
142
0
Michigan
I don't think there is a right or wrong answer here. I hate it when other coaches do it, but I have played the clock game as well. I always make a point to thank other coaches that just play it out, but I would certainly never fault a coach for using the clock to their advantage. I think the bigger issue is, why are we only playing games that last 65-75 min? I think it's ridiculous that we go to a tournament and play 4 inning games. Not a lot of AB's to be had.
 

marriard

Not lost - just no idea where I am
Oct 2, 2011
4,319
113
Florida
I don't think there is a right or wrong answer here. I hate it when other coaches do it, but I have played the clock game as well. I always make a point to thank other coaches that just play it out, but I would certainly never fault a coach for using the clock to their advantage. I think the bigger issue is, why are we only playing games that last 65-75 min? I think it's ridiculous that we go to a tournament and play 4 inning games. Not a lot of AB's to be had.

Well it is a cost/number of teams you can take issue.

If I can schedule in 90 minute time slots I can take 6 teams for every field I have.

If I need to work in 180 minute time slots (and you do to properly accommodate 7 inning games back to back especially at younger ages) I can only take 3 teams for every field I have - which means I need to charge teams 2x your current tournament fees. So your $350-450 weekend tournament is now $700-$900 because I am still using the field/paying umpires/etc for the same amount of time and money. Also any vendors get 1/2 the crowd to sell to - so less people to buy concessions, t-shirts, etc.

Also I get time certainty with timed games back to back (unless there is weather but even then there is an advantage to timed games). Which means in general participants and families have a whole lot less waiting around. 7 i innings can go 1 hour or 3 hours. That is a tournament scheduling nightmare to work with.

In the end 75 min- finish the inning allows for a lot of time and cost certainty while right now hitting a price point where the majority of teams are willing to pay.
 
May 24, 2013
12,461
113
So Cal
Disagree here... first this isn't college softball or high school softball - it is travel softball. They made the clock part of travel, so it is now part of the game and that is how travel softball is intended to be played and it makes a difference in how the game and tournament should be played as well.

They might not have a clock in college, but they are also not expecting to play anywhere between 3 and 8 games in a day either. Also when you look out there be assured that most of the players on your travel team will not play in college so what happens X years from now doesn't really concern me in any way on game day (on practice days and showcase days, yes it does but that is not what we are talking about). Also I know my travel girls learn 7 inning games in high school which is much closer to the college experience, so they can learn that there.

We played 16 hours of softball in 100 degree heat in a losers bracket in ASA a couple of weeks ago. You can be absolutely assured that we played the clock hard. I owe it to my pitchers, my catchers and the team to do so.

A couple of seasons ago, we only had one strong pitcher for a weekend (the other was injured). We absolutely managed the clock and sneaking in innings for our #3 over the 5 games on elimination day we played (note pool games we just played - I wont manage a clock in a pool game unless by winning we avoid the dawn/8am game or if elimination is starting the same day and I am unsure how many games we are going to be asked to play.

So will I do bush league things like untied shoelaces or making up time wasting situations - no. But if I have 3 more back-to-back games to go and I can avoid my pitcher having to throw another inning in THIS game when she may have 12 more to throw, you bet I will. It is situational and I am more than OK with it when I feel it is the right thing to do.

Adding: Families are playing a lot of money to play on these teams. I want to make sure they get value for their $$$. That means more games and deeper into the tournament where possible. A whole new game for the parents and players to enjoy.

As a coach of a 12U TB team, I'm with you 100% on this.
 
Mar 3, 2015
142
0
Michigan
I understand the $ and the difficulty in scheduling, and would be happy to pay more for more time (I'm probably in the minority there). I think 90 min is a fair time, but I have coached in many that have 65-70 min game times. I just don't think thats enough time.

Well it is a cost/number of teams you can take issue.

If I can schedule in 90 minute time slots I can take 6 teams for every field I have.

If I need to work in 180 minute time slots (and you do to properly accommodate 7 inning games back to back especially at younger ages) I can only take 3 teams for every field I have - which means I need to charge teams 2x your current tournament fees. So your $350-450 weekend tournament is now $700-$900 because I am still using the field/paying umpires/etc for the same amount of time and money. Also any vendors get 1/2 the crowd to sell to - so less people to buy concessions, t-shirts, etc.

Also I get time certainty with timed games back to back (unless there is weather but even then there is an advantage to timed games). Which means in general participants and families have a whole lot less waiting around. 7 i innings can go 1 hour or 3 hours. That is a tournament scheduling nightmare to work with.

In the end 75 min- finish the inning allows for a lot of time and cost certainty while right now hitting a price point where the majority of teams are willing to pay.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
42,862
Messages
680,324
Members
21,534
Latest member
Kbeagles
Top