Exactly, JC Heir. There aren't any style points in softball. You don't lose a base for your swing not being technically correct, and no one deducts a tenth of a point because your elbow dropped below the acceptable angle. On the field, it's do or do not. The ball doesn't care what swing you use.
That doesn't mean you don't need to work on it. I'm a firm believer that the better your swing, the better your chances of hitting the ball are. (I know, I know. Duh!) But wherever you are when you step into the box, that's the swing you have to execute to the best of your ability. You can fix the rest later.
One other thought for those who might be skeptical about using MLB hitters to describe or demonstrate principles. I don't think we should limit it that way. I know in teaching pitching and hitting, I will sometimes refer to the martial arts, particularly throwing a punch, to explain either what to do or why. I've seen John Tschida at the University of St. Thomas do the same, only with more expertise than I have. There are all kinds of physical models we can use to illustrate points -- as long as we remember the audience.
That doesn't mean you don't need to work on it. I'm a firm believer that the better your swing, the better your chances of hitting the ball are. (I know, I know. Duh!) But wherever you are when you step into the box, that's the swing you have to execute to the best of your ability. You can fix the rest later.
One other thought for those who might be skeptical about using MLB hitters to describe or demonstrate principles. I don't think we should limit it that way. I know in teaching pitching and hitting, I will sometimes refer to the martial arts, particularly throwing a punch, to explain either what to do or why. I've seen John Tschida at the University of St. Thomas do the same, only with more expertise than I have. There are all kinds of physical models we can use to illustrate points -- as long as we remember the audience.