- Nov 29, 2009
- 2,973
- 83
speed and movement, one is useless without the other
Almost correct. It's change of speed and movement that are the most effective.
speed and movement, one is useless without the other
I will say that what was "good enough" 10 years ago is not "good enough" today. Pitchers and hitters are getting a LOT better. If you are stuck in an organization with a coach who has the mindset of "I've always taught it this way, it's always worked", then run away as quickly as you can. Athletes and coaches MUST be students of the game and continue to learn and adapt.
-W
Thoughts from you folks on this mix that DD currently does:
Rise = mid 60's
FB = 60
Drop = mid 50's
CU = low 40's
Good mix?
This may be a dumb question. Why is the rise so much faster than fb.Thoughts from you folks on this mix that DD currently does:
Rise = mid 60's
FB = 60
Drop = mid 50's
CU = low 40's
Good mix?
First, there must be something wrong with the radar guns or they are not using them correctly.
I like speed and movement, seeing someone well above average for an age group is special. But it's not how "I" gauge a pitcher. I look at results more than anything. K/IP, ERA, WHIP, GP, SV, and the most important is W to L record. The W to L tells me a ton on how the "team" functions with a particular pitcher in the circle. Great pitchers set the pace and tone of the game. I've seen teams go from pumped to flat or vise versa because they respect/rally/confidence behind one pitcher, and not the other.