Thanks for the replies everyone !
Anderson bats run very heavy, so do at least some of the Eastons. A Demarini CF(whatever number you choose) will feel a lot lighter.
My DD had a Techzilla that was an awesome cage bat; that thing was a tank, but it was about 2 ounces over its listed weight.
Its not like I wasn't warned......the plan was to actually use the proof at the plate guarantee and hope she could use it. Had no way
to get one in my hands except to buy one. Once I got to hold & swing it myself said no way ! I let my DD swing it for an hour but
I said to her do NOT remove the plastic wrap ! She really wanted an Anderson bat but I felt better when she said "yeah dad, its
too heavy".
AD, if she really wants an Anderson, a 30/20 Nanotek would be a great option. Its a balanced single wall completely different than the RT, RF, TZ and is comparable in weight and feel to "normal" balanced bats. Excellent pop, BIG sweet spot and its Anderson's top of the line bat (DD swings her 34/24 Nano sometimes late in the day on Sundays when she's worn down and the endload of her 33" RTs or RF is too much). Not being made anymore but the best news is that you can get a new one for under $100 on the bay Anderson NanoTek FP Launch Pad 10 All Sizes FP Softball Bat 017018 NIW | eBay
ETA - It won't have the new USSSA stamp, but is approved by all other associations
Hey Greenmonsters, you say the Nano is Andersons top of the line bat ? Rated over the RT & RF ? I just assumed the Rocketech
was their flagship and top rated bat. How is the pop compared to the CF6 or the Xeno ? Thanks again, always appreciate your
post. Haven't made any decision on another bat yet, leaning heavily toward the CF6. Probably going to wait until my CC has been
reimbursed. I think I'll do a little research on the Nanotek !