Today I was the coach of an 18U team and had third base.
Fed rules.
My runner is stealing 3rd and the throw come in close, but gets past F 5.
The ball bounces off the fence and winds up in shallow left field.
I try to send my runner in to score, but F5 is laying on top of her--which lasted for about 3-5 seconds.
I look to the BU for the obstruction arm but see none.
My girl finally scrambles a few steps to the plate but, seeing the ball is coming back to 3B she slides back.
I ask the umpire for an obstruction call, but he says that because she was going back to 3rd that is the only base she can be awarded.
He then says that he would have awarded her the plate had I sent her--I tell him that without an obstruction signal I did not want to take that risk since she would have been out by a mile.
I explain that if it was not for the obstruction my runner would have easily scored and that she should be awarded the plate.
He disagrees and keeps her on 3rd.
What say you all??
Fed rules.
My runner is stealing 3rd and the throw come in close, but gets past F 5.
The ball bounces off the fence and winds up in shallow left field.
I try to send my runner in to score, but F5 is laying on top of her--which lasted for about 3-5 seconds.
I look to the BU for the obstruction arm but see none.
My girl finally scrambles a few steps to the plate but, seeing the ball is coming back to 3B she slides back.
I ask the umpire for an obstruction call, but he says that because she was going back to 3rd that is the only base she can be awarded.
He then says that he would have awarded her the plate had I sent her--I tell him that without an obstruction signal I did not want to take that risk since she would have been out by a mile.
I explain that if it was not for the obstruction my runner would have easily scored and that she should be awarded the plate.
He disagrees and keeps her on 3rd.
What say you all??
Last edited: