- Apr 6, 2012
- 191
- 0
The grass isn't always greener on the non-daddy ball side.
DD was on a team last year where neither coach had a daughter on the team. However, they had favorites and my DD wasn't one of them. :-(
This year she's on a team where the HC and the ACs have daughters on the team. However, I haven't seen their daughters given more playing time or better spots in the lineup. IMO, they're harder on their daughters than they are on the other girls.
From my experience, this team is focused on long term player development and is well run; it would be a mistake to simply dismiss them as a "daddy-ball" team.
I have seen my share of good and bad coaches on both sides of this issue. You can't assume that a coach is good or bad depending on whether he/she has a child on the team or not.