At all the younger ages, it is common for folks to think that their DDs must play in the infield in order to be one of the "better players" on the team. Once you hit 12U, the outfield starts becoming important. Once you reach 14U and above, it is equally important. You can almost bet that as you rise in age level, you will see fewer and fewer lefties in the infield anywhere but 1B. The reason is simple: It is unfair to a team to have the left-handed girl take the extra split-second to turn and make a throw from anywhere else and it is unfair to the girl because she will never play 2B, SS or 3B at a high level because high-level coaches simply don't do that.
Let her learn 1B and the outfield if she doesn't like playing catcher.
The best softball player I've ever seen live (and one many consider to be perhaps the best ever) is Laura Berg. She's left handed, and she played CF. The current MVP of the women's pro league here in the US is Caitlin Lowe. While she throws right-handed, she hits left and plays .... you guessed it .... CF. If the last two consensus best players in the US are outfielders, I see nothing wrong with anyone's DD wanting to play there. She may even have an advantage over others who willfully stick to playing the infield (because of that 8U/10U stigma) even though their skillset suggests perhaps an outfield spot would be better for them.
Case in point: My current first-year 12U team has two girls on it who are supremely gifted tool-wise to be outfielders. One is tall, long, runs like a gazelle, gets the best break on a fly ball coming off the bat of any girl I've ever seen and has the range of Willie Mays. She also has an absolute cannon for an arm and regularly throws waist-high bullets from CF to 3B and home plate. She came from a rec league in a nearby town and when I asked her at tryouts what position she normally plays, she said, "First base." I shook my head and her mother asked me what was wrong. I told her that there was no other position on the field I could think of where her DD's talents could possibly be more wasted than first base.
The second girl has lightning-quick hands, is maybe even faster than a gazelle, has an even stronger arm than the girl above and has a penchant for running full speed and catching balls hit in the gap. She came to me from a different town's rec league and had played SS all her career. She is now my starting right fielder.
Both these gifted girls had never set foot in the outfield and are having to play catch-up to get up to speed. It is just a shame no one had ever told them what their talents were suited for simply because it is "uncool" to play in the outfield.
Precisely my point. There was one, five years ago, yet lefties represent about 10% of the population......And btw there was a left handed 2nd baseman playing in the WCWS about 5 years ago
it only takes 1 if you are the 1. Give them all a chance. If they win out over the RHPrecisely my point. There was one, five years ago, yet lefties represent about 10% of the population......
How many LH outfielders and 1Bs were there this year? A dozen? More?
My point is, if you play competitively, there will almost always be a right-handed player that is as good or better at the other three infield positions. If there isn't, the team isn't as competitive as it could be. That is not said as a knock on left-handers, it's just a rotten fact of physiology .... and physics.
If she wants to play in the infield, there is plenty of learning and work to be done trying to become an excellent 1B player. Plenty. I say, embrace it and practice and work to be the best darn 1B anybody ever saw and learn the outfield if she has some extraordinary athletic ability.