- Mar 30, 2011
- 34
- 0
I posted this on another forum and didn't get much response so I figured I would ask the question here as well.
Ok my DD is a freakishly strong 5'5 130lb 13 yr old (14 next month) that has been swinging a 33" -10 cf5 for the last year. We are looking for a new bat and cant decide if we should drop down to a -9 or stay with a -10 and just go to the end loaded insane or the likes. Ive done some reading about end loaded bats and they claim that they are designed for the "power hitter" which I would classify my DD. She bats in the #4 spot and had 10hr, 18 triples, 37 doubles with close to 100 RBI in 2013 (should be more but our #3 is a power hitter to lol). She had a 32" rocketech that weighed almost 26oz and had no problem getting it around, it was just to short for her after using the 33" for a while. So I guess the question is, is location of weight better than amount weight? or vise versa??
As a side note, I found a -9 for a great price and picked it up but I'm still unsure if its the right way to go.
Ok my DD is a freakishly strong 5'5 130lb 13 yr old (14 next month) that has been swinging a 33" -10 cf5 for the last year. We are looking for a new bat and cant decide if we should drop down to a -9 or stay with a -10 and just go to the end loaded insane or the likes. Ive done some reading about end loaded bats and they claim that they are designed for the "power hitter" which I would classify my DD. She bats in the #4 spot and had 10hr, 18 triples, 37 doubles with close to 100 RBI in 2013 (should be more but our #3 is a power hitter to lol). She had a 32" rocketech that weighed almost 26oz and had no problem getting it around, it was just to short for her after using the 33" for a while. So I guess the question is, is location of weight better than amount weight? or vise versa??
As a side note, I found a -9 for a great price and picked it up but I'm still unsure if its the right way to go.