Dilemma

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

Jun 17, 2009
15,036
0
Portland, OR
Ok. So in the second phase if he instead attempted to turn the barrel with the hands and did a check swing would that be a better version in your opinion?

That would likely force him to engage his core, which he claimed was the second biggest engine in the swing, but believes to be passive.
 
Jun 8, 2016
16,118
113
That would likely force him to engage his core, which he claimed was the second biggest engine in the swing, but believes to be passive.

Right, I am not saying he would do that version based upon his teachings, but that would be a better drill to do based upon what Buttermaker described as should be happening. Do you agree with
Buttermaker regarding what should be slotting the elbow? I do not see why you cannot still turn the barrel with the hands/forearms even if the initial slotting is due to the "breaking" of the resistance. Would the initiation of the hands/forearms to turn the barrel turn be too late in that case? I do agree Stone isn't turning the barrel properly in his complete swing.
 
Last edited:
Jun 17, 2009
15,036
0
Portland, OR
Justin Stone's demo swing ...

Jstone_Demo.gif
 
Jun 17, 2009
15,036
0
Portland, OR
Right, I am not saying he would do that version based upon his teachings, but that would be a better drill to do based upon what Buttermaker described as should be happening. Do you agree with
Buttermaker regarding what should be slotting the elbow? I do not see why you cannot still turn the barrel with the hands/forearms even if the initial slotting is due to the "breaking" of the resistance. I agree
Stone isn't doing it in his complete swing but I am not sold on that it cannot be done...

From my perspective there are multiple errors and/or emissions in the descriptions given between Stone & Butter here.

Stone speaks of the core being passive ... which it is not.

Butter speaks of the action being all about the forearms ... which it is not ... the involvement of the core is not discussed ... which does lead to a result of the lower half opening with the upper half resisting. Hence Stone's perspective can be understood if one is trying to understand his perspective.

My current view is that Butter is taking the core action for granted and wishes to believe that the proper core action will take place with an objective of turning the barrel ... which does work for some folks, but also fails to work for many developing hitters.
 
Jun 8, 2016
16,118
113
From my perspective there are multiple errors and/or emissions in the descriptions given between Stone & Butter here.

Stone speaks of the core being passive ... which it is not.

Butter speaks of the action being all about the forearms ... which it is not ... the involvement of the core is not discussed ... which does lead to a result of the lower half opening with the upper half resisting. Hence Stone's perspective can be understood if one is trying to understand his perspective.

My current view is that Butter is taking the core action for granted and wishes to believe that the proper core action will take place with an objective of turning the barrel ... which does work for some folks, but also fails to work for many developing hitters.

Gotcha. Thanks.
 
May 3, 2014
2,149
83
From my perspective there are multiple errors and/or emissions in the descriptions given between Stone & Butter here.

Stone speaks of the core being passive ... which it is not.

Butter speaks of the action being all about the forearms ... which it is not ... the involvement of the core is not discussed ... which does lead to a result of the lower half opening with the upper half resisting. Hence Stone's perspective can be understood if one is trying to understand his perspective.

My current view is that Butter is taking the core action for granted and wishes to believe that the proper core action will take place with an objective of turning the barrel ... which does work for some folks, but also fails to work for many developing hitters.

I do know that if you set the hands correctly the core is engaged. It's not a two step process.
 
Jun 6, 2016
2,724
113
Chicago
Great stuff here.

So what I liked about the Stone video is how it shows the lower half going first/keeping the hands back. From the back-and-forth, I don't think anybody disagrees with that idea, just how Stone goes about it. Correct me if I'm wrong there.

One of the big problems I have are girls swinging with just their arms and/or going with an all-back/all-forward approach. So I've used this video primarily to demonstrate that you have to get the lower half/back hip moving first. Is there something better to use than the Stone video? I've shown them GIFs of high-level hitters, but just seeing it doesn't always click. Having someone explain the process helps.
 
Dec 4, 2013
865
18
Perhaps what he was working on, that being continuously pinching the rear scap, was not such a great idea.

You think continuously pinching the rear scap is causing the issues here? I think we can all name ten things that are wrong with this swing.......
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
42,857
Messages
680,288
Members
21,527
Latest member
Ying
Top