To me a crow-hop is when the pitcher "replants" her cleat and pushes off a second time, while a leap is both feet in the air, but the pitcher's push leg lands on the toe and does not "replant". Is that correct?
That's the way I've thought of it.
To me a crow-hop is when the pitcher "replants" her cleat and pushes off a second time, while a leap is both feet in the air, but the pitcher's push leg lands on the toe and does not "replant". Is that correct?
It's a leap as soon as both feet are in the air - it doesn't matter what happens after that.To me a crow-hop is when the pitcher "replants" her cleat and pushes off a second time, while a leap is both feet in the air, but the pitcher's push leg lands on the toe and does not "replant". Is that correct?
So here is the POY from last year. I don't remember anyone getting up in arms about Waldrop at any point. So I guess because it is not as severe it must be OK? otherwise how did all those folks vote for her to be POY?
So here is the POY from last year. I don't remember anyone getting up in arms about Waldrop at any point. So I guess because it is not as severe it must be OK? otherwise how did all those folks vote for her to be POY?
Wasn't Carda in the top three last year as well? That makes two blatant leapers in the top three right? I think Escobedo was in the mix somewhere as well as was Nevins...Ya'll get my drift.
The leap is so common among elite college pitchers that enforcement is IMPOSSIBLE without grinding the game to a halt. That is why it is overlooked so much, that and the crazy punishment that runners advance is too severe. So when a player is called for it they have every right to complain about uneven enforcement. So if the rule is going to be unevenly enforced then I say go ahead and wear a clown shoe to give the ump a reason not to call it at all.
The rule just needs to be changed.