- Aug 17, 2010
- 14
- 0
Sorry guys, just realized it had to be approved!!! It may post 3 or so times!!! It will show her mechanics throwing from her feet and also from her knees.....
Wow a 1.7 and a 1.85 pop time. Were these measured with game footage shot at 30 or 60fps?
My dd just said "I've been clocked at 1.7...then the next one was 2.3...then 2.0". Several of them regularly, probably once a week, get clocked. She said "it's a joke, girls will have a slow time, and swear it was quicker than their fast clocked times." Hard to put a ton of weight into tenths of a second when it depends on someone's thumb time on the watch.
Never put much stock in pop times. You either throw them out or they are safe. Stats are no substitute for results during a game.
Clearly, good pop times are important. But let's be realistic. If you have a catcher that is pretty decent here, but not elite, chances are they aren't going to try to steal on her a whole lot anyway. But she will still have to receive every single pitch, block low balls, let the defense know the scenarios and call out defenses. Wayyy too much emphasis spent by lots of folks on pop times and less on the important stuff. Jmo.
Even looking at video mine ranges trying to do it with a stop watch...I think there's something wrong with my thumb.My dd just said "I've been clocked at 1.7...then the next one was 2.3...then 2.0". Several of them regularly, probably once a week, get clocked. She said "it's a joke, girls will have a slow time, and swear it was quicker than their fast clocked times." Hard to put a ton of weight into tenths of a second when it depends on someone's thumb time on the watch.