It has been discussed on here many times whether or not coaches should call pitches during a game or whether the catcher should call the pitches. There are many that feel strongly that the catcher should always call the pitches and if the coach calls them he/she is just being too controlling.
To take that logic one step further, I was wondering should the 3rd base coach send signs to the batter? Or should the batter be capable of calling their own at-bat? How about giving a base runner the sign to steal a base? Shouldn't the base runner be capable of knowing the situation and steal on their own? What about outfield positioning?
Obviously there are plays that require coordination such as a hit and run, but if you take it to the extreme a batter could somehow signal the base runner that a hit and run was on.
To the "coaches should never call pitches" crowd, what other areas do you think the coaches should turn over to the players. At what age do you start to turn over control to the players?
(for the record I believe catchers should be able to eventually call the game, but leave the option open if a coach feels the need to call the pitches.)
To take that logic one step further, I was wondering should the 3rd base coach send signs to the batter? Or should the batter be capable of calling their own at-bat? How about giving a base runner the sign to steal a base? Shouldn't the base runner be capable of knowing the situation and steal on their own? What about outfield positioning?
Obviously there are plays that require coordination such as a hit and run, but if you take it to the extreme a batter could somehow signal the base runner that a hit and run was on.
To the "coaches should never call pitches" crowd, what other areas do you think the coaches should turn over to the players. At what age do you start to turn over control to the players?
(for the record I believe catchers should be able to eventually call the game, but leave the option open if a coach feels the need to call the pitches.)