Keep track of Quality at Bats instead of average. IMO it is more accurate on what kind of offensive season your players are having.
I like the concept. What is your definition of "quality?"
Keep track of Quality at Bats instead of average. IMO it is more accurate on what kind of offensive season your players are having.
I like the concept. What is your definition of "quality?"
What is considered a good QAB percentage?QAB: Quality at bats (any one of):
3 pitches after 2 strikes,
6+ pitch ABs,
XBH,
HHB,
BB,
SAC Bunt,
SAC Fly.
QAB: Quality at bats (any one of):
3 pitches after 2 strikes,
6+ pitch ABs,
XBH,
HHB,
BB,
SAC Bunt,
SAC Fly.
Rd...your box is full.Not that I don't agree with what is posted above but, if the HC/coaches don't agree nor use these stats they are meaningless. They do mean some thing to me and gauging DD progress. Some coaches only see base hits & RBI's and winning.
Our stats show 3 different QAB types but I don't know the differences.QAB: Quality at bats (any one of):
3 pitches after 2 strikes,
6+ pitch ABs,
XBH,
HHB,
BB,
SAC Bunt,
SAC Fly.
What is considered a good QAB percentage?