- Oct 25, 2009
- 3,334
- 48
It seems like it would follow the same logic as a tossed or dropped bat.
Discarded equipment becomes part of the field. If anyone can show me a rule where discarded equipment is a basis for an OBS call, I'd love to see it.
For any sanction?
NFHS does have an interpretation that discarded fielder's masks can be ruled as an obstruction to a runner if the runner's path is altered by it. To the best of my knowledge, they are the only ones that have made this an official interpretation.
But still...I can't help but wonder about a play like this: Suppose a fielder sees a runner heading for home, so she takes off her glove and throws it at the runner's feet, tripping her. Why would that not be obstruction?
In any sanction, if I believe that fielder's are intentionally discarding equipment at runners, or into their path, I could easily see addressing it as an usportsmanlike act.
Had a strange one a couple of years ago in a high school baseball game. Runner on third. Batter puts down a bunt. Catcher comes out to field it, removes his helmet and very deliberately rolls it straight up the third base line, like a freaking bowling ball! The runner didn't advance on the play. I told the catcher that I had better not see him do that again...and he didn't.
Only if the defense starts dropping bats around.It seems like it would follow the same logic as a tossed or dropped bat.
official equipment which may be in live ball territory with no penalty includes the batter's bat, the catcher's mask, umpire paraphernalia, a helmet which has inadvertently fallen off an offensive or defensive player during play or any equipment belonging to a person assigned to the game. Loose equipment, misc items or detached uniform parts whaich are in live ball territory and are not being legally used iin the game could cause a blocked ball or interference."
I found what I had read. Sorry, it is in the USSSA rulebook Rule 2 Sec 7. "All players are permitted to wear any approved protective equipment including catcher's equipment, batter's helmet,fasemasks, and soccer style shin guards. If used, the equipment must not be detached. Detached equipment can result in obstruction or interference ruling. Repeated acts could be grounds for ejection".
Brettman, since that sentence does specifically call out certain equipment, couldn't it be argued that discarding a face mask wouldnt be protected here and could be grounds for obstruction. I read that last sentence as refering to item not being used in the game at that time.