- Jun 22, 2008
- 3,438
- 48
SoftSocDad & MTR, you are reading way too much into this.
Who is whining? Agenda? Title IX? You are the ones that appear to have political agendas.
Wow, speaking of reading way too much into something. Is that you, Mr. Pot?
My reasons for having a girl play with the girls is because 1) she would be EXCLUDED by the local baseball league after she turns 9 and 2) the parents have been acting out of convenience not because they are enlightened about gender issues. I do not have a need to have all women in the kitchen. After raising daughters and no sons, I am well aware of how girl's programs generally get the short end of things when it comes to sports.
Traditionally, there have been boy's sports and girl's sports. This country is a long way from gender-blindness, especially in the area of youth and school based sports. You would have to be an idiot to deny that. My question is not one of keeping a woman from getting Saturday morning tee times at your local county club, it is having a very unusual (for my area) situation come up in a rec league. There may be some leagues around the country that are co-ed through 18&U in diamond sports - great, I want to hear how it works.
Most people's initial reaction to this situation is that in a non-coed diamond sport league, most boys would not be caught dead playing because of alleged threats to their manhood/teasing in school. When it is a girl playing with boys it is usually deemed a novelty or "playing up".
So back to my question about a boy in a girl's softball league:
For all the gender does not matter folks: There was a thread on this site about the possibility of fielding an all-girl baseball team in a boy's league. What about an all-boy softball team in a girl's league? Where do you draw the line? In adult co-ed there are gender requirements in all aspects of the game; overall ratio, batting order, fielding positions and defense. How does this work for youth, especially if you could not achieve a 50-50 ratio?
If there has been a girl's league that denied a willing male participant I would want to know about that as well. My feeling is that most parents in this girl's league will not like having boys mixed in. This country is a representative democracy, but there are laws that prevent the majority from imposing its will on a minority. So if this has already been argued about in other areas I would like to know about how it came out.
Soccer seems to not have as many issues with this but there is no difference in the game, ball, or field dimensions for same age boys and girls. Additionally, soccer does not have to deal with the 'baseball is a boy's game and softball is a girl's game' notion. Maybe I should have drunk the Kool-Aid and gotten my daughters involved in soccer to avoid having to worry about gender-based youth sports issues.
A note to SoftSocDad, MTR and others: If all you want to do is comment with you perceptions of what you think is my "agenda", stay with SoftSocDad's plan and stay out of this thread. If you have something beyond trying make this thread simply about gender issues, play on.
I didn't mention any agenda, you did. However, I'll try to make this simple for you. Anyone with the slightest ability to comprehend low-level American English would understand that my only issue was why there was even a discussion on the subject.
But now that you raised the issue, it is not a coincidence that Congress passed Title IX and girls being allowed to play LL ball occured the same summer. A couple years later LL Softball appeared. Any idea why? IMO, to keep the girls off the baseball field. Seems like that sentiment is still live and well.