The whole gist of the article is that with a two seam orientation, the rough v smooth surface can be achieved far better than a 4 seam pitch by slightly tilting the axis of rotation.
Or put another way, does a knuckleball have movement? if so then why? It isn't spin, it is the pressure gradient caused by a smooth vs rough surface to the wind.
???
But, the article doesn't say that. The article discussing a split finger fastball, not a 2S fastball. All it says is that split finger pitch is thrown with a 2S orientation. It never concludes that the 2S orientation is better than a 4S orientation.
The article discusses a pitch thrown by Freddie Garcia. Nathan says that the axis of rotation of the pitch causes one side of the ball to be "smoother" than the other. The article describes the spin axis as "is horizontal (backspin) and tilted slightly in the forward direction." The movement of the ball is caused by the crazy orientation of the axis.
Knuckleballs are a whole different animal because they spin very little. If there is little spin, then the seams act like slowly oscillating rudders making the ball go up and down and left and right.
Pitch-track software and hi-frame rate video document that 99.9% of knuckleballs 'move' or break smoothly
???
But, the article doesn't say that. The article discussing a split finger fastball, not a 2S fastball. All it says is that split finger pitch is thrown with a 2S orientation. It never concludes that the 2S orientation is better than a 4S orientation.
The article discusses a pitch thrown by Freddie Garcia. Nathan says that the axis of rotation of the pitch causes one side of the ball to be "smoother" than the other. The article describes the spin axis as "is horizontal (backspin) and tilted slightly in the forward direction." The movement of the ball is caused by the crazy orientation of the axis.
Knuckleballs are a whole different animal because they spin very little. If there is little spin, then the seams act like slowly oscillating rudders making the ball go up and down and left and right.
I have been wanting to try two seam pitches for a while. We experimented with them a while back but DD was uncomfortable with them and they caused her to lose a good amount of speed so we tabled it. Yesterday i got a wild hair and I searched the forum on Two seam pitches and found a lot of misinformation. The two seam pitches do not move because of spin, they move because of a pressure gradient caused by one side of the ball being relatively smooth while the other side is rough because the seams are to the wind. The ball will break in the direction of the seams.
For those of you that have DDs that can throw a 4 seamer with the slightly off axis 12-6 rotation, have her throw the same pitch as a two seamer and see if it cuts in. The physics at work here is the same as what occurs in swing bowling in cricket. It is also the same thing that makes knuckleballs move and why some describe two seamers as being unpredictable...
[video]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t-3jnOIJg4k[/video]
Try it and see what you get.
We tried it yesterday and had some very good results for a first effort, got balls to break in and out. DD was really having fun with them this time.
I am sure there are folks (Riseball) who have DDs using this pitch at a high level. Please chime in so we get the benefit of your experience seeing it used live.
Where is the documentation? Where did you read it?
Of course, all motion is continuous except in quantum mechanics. I'm not sure what your point it.
Good thread. DD has figured out a way to consistently make a 2 seamer break sharply outside. Its never just flat. It is usually about 3 mph slower than the 4 though. Its a mystery to me. DD does have long fingers though.