Yesterday my daughter's team and another team each won all three of their pool play games. To break the tie, they used the run differential method. Biggest run differential got the #1 seed in bracket play.
Our third game was a close one, with the score tied 10-10 in the last inning. We managed to hold the other team to no runs and got our last up to bat. We had one out when we scored the "winning" run. At that time, the umpire ended the game and declared our team the winner.
And you know what happened next, right? The other team that won their 3 games beat us in run differential and got the #1 seed. I'd like to know if this is a common practice. It seems to me that we should have been allowed to finish our half of the inning, and allowed to score as many runs as we could. But that's obviously now how it was done. It doesn't seem very fair to me.
Is this just the way it is?
Our third game was a close one, with the score tied 10-10 in the last inning. We managed to hold the other team to no runs and got our last up to bat. We had one out when we scored the "winning" run. At that time, the umpire ended the game and declared our team the winner.
And you know what happened next, right? The other team that won their 3 games beat us in run differential and got the #1 seed. I'd like to know if this is a common practice. It seems to me that we should have been allowed to finish our half of the inning, and allowed to score as many runs as we could. But that's obviously now how it was done. It doesn't seem very fair to me.
Is this just the way it is?