- Jul 17, 2012
- 1,086
- 38
I just spent the last hour leafing through the Model Swings sticky in the Hitting Technical forum to look for swings for my individual players to try to emulate based on similarities in their start point. I came across a few threads that refer to there being one swing, whether baseball or softball. It's obviously not the first time I've heard the "Debate". More often than not, the side favors "There's only ONE" ideal swing. For the sake of conversation....I'm starting NOT to buy this anymore. Not that there's any critical differences.....but there's clearly more challenges presented in the game of fastpitch than there is in baseball. The only reason I say that is because the hitters perception of the vertical plane of the pitch for softball can change in 2 directions...in baseball it's only going to change in one direction. Forgive my ignorance....but for a consistent hitter to be consistent....there has to be some level of difference in the mechanics to be able to prep for a pitch that's going to elevate above the perceived path of the ball as opposed to preparing to adjust to only a descending path. Obviously what I'm talking about is the challenge the rise presents in FP.
So...when you see the Fastpitch pitcher make the baseball hitters look stupid..... is that just for TV? OR is there truly a difference in the fundamental mechanics that a hitter needs to understand to be able to hit the pitch that perceptually "rises" through the hitting zone?
So...when you see the Fastpitch pitcher make the baseball hitters look stupid..... is that just for TV? OR is there truly a difference in the fundamental mechanics that a hitter needs to understand to be able to hit the pitch that perceptually "rises" through the hitting zone?