- May 29, 2015
- 3,851
- 113
We play more games with one umpire than we do with two.
Why? I’m seriously interested to know ... is it due to the shortage of officials or is it by choice ($$)?
We play more games with one umpire than we do with two.
I'm speaking about their general inexperience with the game overall. It's not just the fact that they have never played the game, it's the fact that they have never played the game combined with the fact that they are brand new umpires. Surely you would agree that a new umpire would be better equipped to call a game if they had played the game a number of years versus never having played the game at all? Playing the game gives a person a leg up on someone who has never played the game when they start out. Now after they have been calling a few years, that advantage dissipates. In my area we are seeing more and more new umpires show up to call games and their inexperience shows. When asked casually after the game about their playing experience, it is shocking the number that have never played at all. Even in little league.
Why? I’m seriously interested to know ... is it due to the shortage of officials or is it by choice ($$)?
What does this thread show in regards to this? The people that have played the game and/or coached but not umpired it said the umpire blew the call and you agreed with us. The only difference was you tried to tell us why you think he blew the call. That doesn't change anything about the fact that the call was blown and non-umpires and umpires alike agreed.I can’t say I disagree with this 100%, but I feel there is more wrong than there is right. I’m not saying playing doesn’t help a person know what to expect, but if you have only played (or coached) then you are watching the game from a completely different perspective and seeing completely different things than an umpire. If somebody played (or coached) they have to be “un-trained” from watching the game that way. This thread is a great example.
This is true. You were obviously talking about some umpires. I stand corrected.I never ever said that all umpires do it for the money so please don't put words in my mouth.
What does this thread show in regards to this? The people that have played the game and/or coached but not umpired it said the umpire blew the call and you agreed with us. The only difference was you tried to tell us why you think he blew the call. That doesn't change anything about the fact that the call was blown and non-umpires and umpires alike agreed.
What does this thread show in regards to this? The people that have played the game and/or coached but not umpired it said the umpire blew the call and you agreed with us. The only difference was you tried to tell us why you think he blew the call. That doesn't change anything about the fact that the call was blown and non-umpires and umpires alike agreed.
Ump did not call "infield fly" on this play. When questioned about the decision by defensive HC, ump refused to acknowledge it as a routine play.
The resulting discussion between the ump and HC lead to the HC being relocated to the parking lot.