Many generalizations to follow...
Men's sports are faster and more dynamic than the women's side of the same sport (basketball is a good example). This is just the nature of the difference in physical size and power of the athletes. Related to that, fans are attracted to seeing sports played at the highest level (fastest, highest scoring, etc.), which is the men's game. The revenue of a bigger fan base is additionally compounded by more sponsorship money targeting that larger fan base. The reality of the business side is that if there is more revenue, there is more money for salaries, facilities, etc. You can't pay athletes if the money isn't there. IMO, sexism has very little to do with it.
The other thing is we are talking about long established leagues - the NBA is 71 years old and can trace back further. MLB 114 yrs. NFL goes back 90+ years. MLS appeals to the world of people who are here. NHL somewhat regional in the USA but also has been around forever.
There are excellent and well supported woman's basketball leagues in Europe, Australia and other places. Netball is a purely woman's sport where regionally it is played professionally has a huge following. But these are built and supported from junior age groups on up - they are not independent teams. Long term - different models. You can't go from zero to NBA - you can't skip the steps and the work to get there.
And it is not just mens athletics and speed advantage - we have a great national volleyball team, but no one watches it. BUT there is a great pro league elsewhere where they do. There is a long list of other sports that have not and probably cannot support a pro league.
Last edited: