Another (albeit small) reason I like calling pitches in from the catcher.
DD gets on mound, gets sign from catcher. Pitches. No worries about this rule.
I hate cards but
Another (albeit small) reason I like calling pitches in from the catcher.
DD gets on mound, gets sign from catcher. Pitches. No worries about this rule.
I've offered that suggestion to coaches whose pitchers are moving to quickly. "Coach, it's not required, but having her take the signal on the plate will fix that problem."
PGF uses NFHS rules (with a few exceptions) which do not require the signal to be taken on the pitcher's plate. (Although, per their website at this moment, they do still require both feet to be in contact with the pitcher's plate.)
Either the umpire mixed it up and he applied NCAA's new rule (possible) or he was calling her for something else. I think you said he specified that though, right?
I hate cards but
DD is still in MS. I had two local HS coaches call and ask me about Florida HS rules. Florida HS use NFHS rules but have not changed the two feet in contact with the rubber. Which I think contradicts itself. I haven't worried about it since my DD is in MS and we still only work with both feet on the rubber. Was a HS athletic director for 17 years but not anymore but they still call me. LOL
I forgot somebody (you?) mentioned their state (FL?) was not accepting the adoption of the new NFHS rule.
I forgot somebody (you?) mentioned their state (FL?) was not accepting the adoption of the new NFHS rule.
Not a pitching coach, so my opinion is worth ... ehhh ... Anyway, I’ve said it before:
Why would a coach change what an established pitcher was doing based on this rule?! It’s not a “you must”, it’s a “you may”.