Sequence?

Welcome to Discuss Fastpitch

Your FREE Account is waiting to the Best Softball Community on the Web.

TDS

Mar 11, 2010
2,924
113
Swinging "down to" against the hips.

sOEPzv9.gif

IXelwq7.gif

urg3LbL.gif

a8wsse2.gif


VS

Bxr6FYl.gif


3ZhnjeI.gif
 

TDS

Mar 11, 2010
2,924
113
One allows for the barrel to flatten while the other chops across.

Bonds leveraged and swinging "down to" against his hips extending.

mvZpqjg.gif


Bobby swinging "down to" while shifting his weight to the front leg (ABAF).

knzdEtX.gif
 

fanboi22

on the journey
Nov 9, 2015
1,138
83
SE Wisconsin
Fanboi, this is some interesting information. I am trying to understand the Kvest graphs you posted, and I have perused through some other online Kvest information. I'm not going to pretend to understand it all, but I do have some questions/comments.

In the "efficient" swing, it looks like Kvest shows that the pelvis fires first, and then torso, upper arm and hand fire at roughly the same time. From the graph, I can't tell how much time is supposed to elapse between the pelvis firing and then everything elsefiring. What do the 100, 200, 300 on the graph represent? Depending on the answer to this question, I would be asking about how that time frame affects the mental process of the hitter. For example, I assume we have to be talking about hundreths of a second here. So does it make sense for the hitter to consciously try to start the hips first? Do big leaguers think that way? Or do they think "fire all guns!" and the hips just happen to start 2/100 of a second faster? But again, I can't really tell what the timeframe is from the graphs.

Also, to me it looks like the big difference in the efficient vs. non-efficient swing is the quickness of the launch. The non-efficient swing appears to begin gradually, whereas the efficient swing appears to explode upward immediately.

Depending on the time frame between pelvis firing and everything else firing, I might argue that the Kvest data supports what I'm saying. Except for some slight lead by the pelvis, everything else fires at the same time. It's pretty clear that the segments should stop (or decelerate) in a specific order, but that's another issue altogether. At a minimum, the Kvest data shows that torso, upper arm and hand should all fire at the same time. Those segments do not appear to be waiting for the previous segments to fire before beginning.
Hey James, i am definitely not an expert at this but believe your assessment is mostly correct based on what i understand as well. When the upper parts are out of sync looks to be when there are problems.

The vertical axis is showing rotational speed/angular velocity or whatever the correct term is, how fast the bits are going. The horizontal axis represents the time elapsed, from left to right as the different parts of the body fire. As the line spikes up, that signifies the start of the motion from what i understand and the leveling and turning down is the slowing and stopping. To your comments here and elsewhere, the hips should stop before the torso and hands.

i think the answer to your question of the hitters thinking about it, i would say no. That their 'sequence' is separating the top and bottom and firing the hips is that stretch time and the top 'follows' for a lack of better terms. I do think that they all 'fire' at once, but because there is negative move which i think you see with the lines going down before 'fire' that the graph shows the delay in time until the rubber band snaps and the upper parts start going forward.
 
Aug 20, 2020
79
18
One allows for the barrel to flatten while the other chops across.

Bonds leveraged and swinging "down to" against his hips extending.

mvZpqjg.gif


Bobby swinging "down to" while shifting his weight to the front leg (ABAF).

knzdEtX.gif

TDS, I'm pretty sure I agree with what you're saying. One question I have is, what do you mean by "hips extending"? Are you using the word "extending" to differentiate from the word "rotating"?
 

TDS

Mar 11, 2010
2,924
113
TDS, I'm pretty sure I agree with what you're saying. One question I have is, what do you mean by "hips extending"? Are you using the word "extending" to differentiate from the word "rotating"?

Jamesd1628, its what helps apply the breaks to the hips vs rotating them to transfer energy. Think of it in terms of the obliques contracting against the hips extending within the sagittal plane. More noticeable on the off-speed pitch.

ZfgRFqF.gif

J1c5pt0.png
 
Last edited:
Aug 20, 2020
79
18
Jamesd1628, its what helps apply the breaks to the hips vs rotating them to transfer energy. Think of it in terms of the obliques contracting against the hips extending within the sagittal plane. More noticeable on the off-speed pitch.

ZfgRFqF.gif

So you're saying that, rather than rotating, Bonds is performing some variation of this move:


sOEPzv9.gif
 

TDS

Mar 11, 2010
2,924
113
So you're saying that, rather than rotating, Bonds is performing some variation of this move:


sOEPzv9.gif

Yes, once he becomes leveraged fyb (both legs).. Its why these guys talk about swinging "down to"

.I know there's allot more going on in the swing then the obliques contracting against the hips but the source of the engine is there.

1STqj4K.gif


3wLHMQV.gif


J1c5pt0.png
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
42,857
Messages
680,197
Members
21,504
Latest member
winters3478
Top